Wednesday, February 19, 2020
Get Adobe Flash player

Red-shirt demonstrators will not confront anti-government protesters on January 13, caretaker Deputy Commerce Minister and red-shirt leader Nuttawut Saikuar said Friday.

He said the rallies of the red shirts on January 13 would be held in many provinces, but not in Bangkok and its adjacent provinces.

To avoid confrontations with supporters of the People’s Democratic Reform Committee, the red shirts will not rally in the southern provinces either, Nuttawut added.

He said the rallies would be held simultaneously at 9am at important venues in the provinces and on main roads. The rallies are being held to oppose a coup and to express support for the February 2 election.

The campaigns would have as their slogan “introducing the real owners of the ruling mandate and opening the door to the election”, Nuttawut said.

In the evening, there will be panel discussions at three stages in the North, the Northeast and the Central region. Participants will include academics, representatives of selected professions and famous individuals from various walks of life as well as pro-democracy fighters and politicians, he added.

Jatuporn Promphan, a red-shirt leader, said the people who are against the planned Bangkok shutdown by the PDRC should come out to join the rallies.

(Time) The Red Shirts and the Yellow Shirts are agreeing on something for once — and that is, that neither side wants to forgive the other

Thousands crowded onto the streets of Bangkok on Thursday to protest the passing of an amnesty bill that wipes away all charges relating to political violence since 2004.

Fervent demonstrators in V for Vendetta masks and sweat-drenched tees braved the muggy heat along with old ladies clutching hand fans. “There’s nothing to lose,” says Jintana, a 59-year-old employee of an export firm, who was in a crowd jammed into a long, narrow field by the city’s Samsen railway station. “We will be suppressed anyhow, so we fight until the last breath.”

Yellow Shirt sympathizers like Jintana are opposed to the legislation because it would quash the corruption conviction of exiled former Thai Prime Minster Thaksin Shinawatra — a divisive figure, whose ousting in a military coup in 2006 sparked years of street rallies, mass sieges and sporadic bloodletting. “We hate corrupt government and we hate Thaksin Shinawatra,” explains another 40-year-old protester called Amy.

However, those on the other side of Thailand’s color-coded political divide — the Red Shirts — are also vehemently opposed, but for very different reasons. They want justice for comrades killed in the 2010 crackdown. The prospect of general amnesty has them fearing that justice will never be served.

Despite this widespread opposition, at around 4 a.m. on Friday morning the amnesty bill was passed by the Thai legislature with 310 votes to zero with four abstentions.

Thai politics has long been characterized by shows of popular force; mass Yellow Shirt protests led to the 2006 coup, and a Red Shirt rally that swarmed over central Bangkok in 2010 was violently crushed with more than 80 civilians killed and around 2,000 injured. Tanks rolled into popular shopping districts of the Thai capital and snipers, widely assumed to be backed by the military, picked off victims from rooftops amid carnage a world away from the Land of Smiles portrayed on popular tourist brochures.

But now these grassroots political groups have formed an unholy alliance against the amnesty bill. The Yellow Shirts — generally urban royalists and nationalists joined under the banner of the People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD) — fear the return of their nemesis Thaksin. The Red Shirts — rural poor known as the United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD) — want those responsible for the 2010 bloodshed to be held accountable.

In 2011, Thaksin’s sister Yingluck Shinawatra was elected Prime Minister as head of the Pheu Thai Party largely on the back of huge Red Shirt support. Calls for restitution for the victims of 2010 — the military incursion was ostensibly ordered by then Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva of the PAD-backed Democrat Party — reverberated throughout the UDD rank and file. “They want justice for the violence that claimed their loved ones,” says Thitinan Pongsudhirak, professor of political science at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok.

The amnesty bill seems to be the final nail in the coffin for these hopes. Abhisit and his then Deputy Prime Minister Suthep Thaugsuban have been charged with murder but will not face trial, and the UDD is incensed that Pheu Thai is “climbing over the bodies of the Red Shirts so Thaksin can come home,” says Pavin Chachavalpongpun, associate professor at Kyoto University’s Centre for Southeast Asian Studies.

UDD leaders spat venom at their former Pheu Thai brothers in arms in parliament as the vote approached. Prasang Monkonsiri, a left-leaning Red Shirt and former editor of the Voice of Taksin magazine, labeled Pheu Thai lawmakers in favor of the amnesty bill as “traitors” and “whores” who will develop “the faces of leprous dogs” owing to the “hundred ghosts of people you led to their deaths.”

Even within Pheu Thai, four MPs suffered a crisis of conscience and abstained from the amnesty vote, including Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Cooperatives Nattawut Saikua. “This is a turning point for the Red Shirts,” says Thitinan. After ousting the Democrat Party at the ballot box, an apparent chasm now divides the UDD and Pheu Thai. “Down the line, it will make it more difficult to reconcile Thailand.”

Adding fuel to the fire, Red Shirt political prisoners serving time on lése majestè grounds were conspicuously left out of the amnesty bill. Otherwise known as article 112, lése majestè is an antiquated law prohibiting any remarks deemed offensive to the Thai royal family, but critics argue its mandate has been widened to curb general dissent.

So while Pheu Thai widened the amnesty bill to include Thaksin and those soldiers who gunned down unarmed Red Shirts in the street, “it has not seen fit to include the victims alongside the perpetrators: those imprisoned for the peaceful expression of their political beliefs,” says Benjamin Zawacki, senior legal adviser for Southeast Asia at the International Commission of Jurists.

Pavin warns the amnesty bill “deepens the culture of impunity in Thailand.” Over the past century, the nation has witnessed several bloody coups and associated strife, but few individuals or groups have been held accountable. “It could set a new standard in Thai politics that the state can kill people and get away with it again in the future.”

Analysts say Pheu Thai probably placed wiping Thaksin’s criminal record above all else from the beginning. “I don’t think it’s a last-minute thing,” says Pavin, “I think everything has been well calculated.” Zawacki agrees: “An objective analysis shows that [Thaksin’s return] is the only real benefit the [Red Shirts] stand to gain.”

Despite the promise of amnesty, Thaksin is unlikely jump on a plane if popular support is dwindling. “Thaksin is very shrewd,” adds Thitinan. “He’s testing the water to see how much he can get away with.” Powerful forces including the influential Privy Council and royal family have long been a thorn in the media mogul’s side, but there are signs this may be waning. Nevertheless, “If he thinks it’s not the right time then he’ll stay away and it will be back to business as usual.”

There are still several stages before the amnesty bill becomes law. First it needs to be passed by Senate, and then ratified by the King. The Democrat Party — whose MPs walked out of Friday’s vote en masse — may even challenge it at the Constitutional Court.

While the long-term consequences might threaten Pheu Thai’s dominance at the ballot box, the short-term impact could be fresh unrest. “Political violence could come back to Bangkok any time soon,” says Pavin, adding an extra note of caution that “this time around anyone could be the enemy” because of the blurring of traditional allegiances.

Thitinan admits the “likelihood for confrontation has risen dramatically” as Thaksin’s opponents “will come out to create conditions of ungovernability — just chaos in the street.” But according to Zawacki, the government will likely invoke the Internal Security Act to ensure the protests are either contained or paid for with a heavy legal price.

Relatives of slain red shirts seek peaceful solution

Posted by Rattana_S On December - 8 - 2013 ADD COMMENTS

Family members of the three red shirts killed during the latest round of political violence said they hoped no more people will end up being killed and urged all sides to seek a peaceful resolution for the country. Their deaths come even as none of the killers involved in the political violence of 2010 have been apprehended yet.

“I want to see peace. I don’t want to see such things occurring again,” said Maneerat Kemnak, the 21-year-old daughter of Viroj Kemnak, who was killed by gun shot in the early hours of last Sunday near Rajamangala Sports Stadium in Bangkok where the reds held a rally.

“I feel sorry for HM the King and the fact that we call our society a democracy. Let us not kill one another anymore.”

Surarat Thongphu, mother of killed red-shirt demonstrator, Vishnu Thongphu, said she’s worried that more could die in the days ahead. “If they don’t stop [the confrontation], many more will die.”

The same sentiment was aired by Thachid Viengkham, uncle of slain red-shirt off-duty conscript soldier Thanasit Viengkham, 22. “I want both sides to stop and seek a solution through negotiations.”

Thachid said Thanasit went to join the rally out of his own will and volunteered when red-shirt leaders asked for help. Sudarat wanted the police to quickly bring the killer of her son to justice, however, adding that she felt the media have played down the news about the death of red shirts. “I lost a bread winner,” she said, adding that her son, a company technician, was financially supporting her parents.

Maneerat, who’s still a third-year university student at Sri Saket Rajabhat University said she was speechless about her father’s death, however, she was not interested in politics. Her father, Viroj, was an employee at the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration.

They all said the red-shirt movement and the related government agencies have been providing assistance although they refused to provide details. None of them said they had received any messages of condolences from leaders of the anti-government protest groups or the opposition Democrat party. Sudarat said a wreath was sent for her 26-year-old son’s funeral by Bangkok Governor MR Sukhumbhand Paribatra, however.

Both sides of the ongoing political conflict are allowing Thailand to slide further into destructive turmoil, without any obvious attempt to avoid it.

The clashes between some government supporters and student protesters in and outside Ramkhamhaeng University on Saturday – and between police and anti-government protesters outside many government offices in the capital yesterday – indicate that both the authorities and the protest leaders have broken their vows not to resort to violence.

Shots were fired into Ramkhamhaeng University on Saturday night and yesterday morning, leaving at least three people dead and more than 50 others injured. Red-shirt leaders also claimed there were casualties among government supporters gathering in the adjacent Rajamangala Stadium in support of the administration.

Police protecting government offices, including Government House and the Metropolitan Police Bureau, fired many rounds of teargas at protesters attempting to force their way into the compounds.

These ugly scenes do not bode well for our country. And the chance of seeing this new conflict resolved any time soon has been shattered.

It is also nonsense, and even deplorable, for protest leaders to demand that key television stations – namely Channels 3, 5, 7, Modernine, NBT and Thai PBS – broadcast live an announcement by protest leader Suthep Thaugsuban, who is also secretary-general of the People’s Democratic Reform Committee. This can be construed as intimidation of the media and as a threat to media freedom.

It was reminiscent of coup-makers in the past making their announcements to the public after seizing control of state media.

Although all stations refused to completely follow the demand, the protest leaders acted against democratic principles by making such an order. The protesters, particularly Suthep, had accused the government of intervening and influencing the media, but now they were doing just that. It was the pot calling the kettle black.

However, there is still a slim chance of avoiding further bloodshed. The protesters should restrain themselves within legal boundaries and Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra and her government should seriously consider solutions proposed by business circles and academics on how to get out of this crisis – such as stepping down or dissolving the House of Representatives.

This may not completely solve the country’s problems, but should help defuse the current crisis.

Nevertheless, there is also a need to rewrite the Constitution in order to pave the way for eventual political reform acceptable to all parties involved.